I didn't say it referred to the BOR. I said it encompassed the "rights recognized in the BOR".
You said earlier that Article IV essentially says that a state cannot treat a citizen of another state differently than their own.
How can that be if privileges and immunities do not encompass rights?
OK.
Article IV, Section 2 was written and ratified before the BOR was even added to the constitution. How could Article IV, Section 2 encompass the rights recognized in the BOR when the BOR didn't even exist?
I said nothing about rights. I was talking about privileges and immunities. Did you miss that? Did you not understand that?
Article IV, Section 2 deals with privileges and immunities, not rights. I said when it comes to Article IV privileges and immunities, a state cannot treat a citizen of another state differently than their own.