Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen

Shotguns are not a novel concept, and haven't been for hundreds of years. A few inches size difference, and even the change in loading mechanism, do not appreciably detract from the core function which remains pretty much the same. To attempt to draw a line between the two re:RKBA is to expose a bias that will not be satisfied by any examples or words, instead passionately seeking out any variance upon which to hang the "because of X, you can't exercise that right" argument.


1,115 posted on 03/13/2007 3:23:56 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1113 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2
"A few inches size difference, and even the change in loading mechanism, do not appreciably detract from the core function which remains pretty much the same."

Baloney. Take four inches off the barrel and you'll see a wider spread and a lower velocity.

"To attempt to draw a line between the two re:RKBA is to expose a bias"

Baloney. The shotgun in use at the time was 20". The law set 18" as the minimum, not because of any bias but because scumbags like Mr. Miller were concealing them and using them in criminal acts. A reasonable restriction that you don't happen to care for.

You come along and start making this 4th grade argument about "if 18" why not 17?" Fine. Make it. But not with me.

1,120 posted on 03/13/2007 4:38:00 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson