I fixed your post.
As I wrote earlier in this thread, ID does not identify the source of the intelligent design, and that is a *major* difference from creationism.
And the fabricators of ID also claimed that it's obvious the designer is God. Look it up.
And if you get right down to it, the claim ID doesn't identify the designer, not offers any concept, evidence or testable hypothesis behind this is proof that ID is philosophical and not scientific. And you forgot to mention that even Behe admits ID does not contradict evolution.
Man, you are one dense SOB. Whether ID was "designed" to support anything is irrelevant. What is relevant is the evidence to support it, and that is overwhelming. But don't take my word for it. Read what the greatest scientist of all time had to say about it -- before science had even an inkling about the amazing complexity of the simplest living cell:
"This most elegant system of the sun, planets, and comets could not have arisen without the design and dominion of an intelligent and powerful being." --Sir Isaac Newton, The Principia
Read that over and over until you have it memorized, moron.