Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RussP
I could give many other examples, but I don't have time.

Wow, the good old Fermat's school of arguing: I have discovered a truly remarkable proof which this margin is too small to contain.

Respected mathematicians claim to have proven that the first living cell could not have possibly come into existance by purely naturalistic mechanisms. I don't have references handy, but this is not controversial. Evolutionists simply dismiss such research.

Oh, it's controversial - and you should provide a link to your point of view...

162 posted on 03/12/2007 12:22:46 AM PDT by si tacuissem (sapere aude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: si tacuissem

If you don't mind, I'll just leave you to your ignorance. You seem to be so proud of it anyway.


163 posted on 03/12/2007 1:08:26 AM PDT by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

To: si tacuissem; RussP; taxesareforever
Oh that is right. Everything is controversial, except the conclusion of the evolutionist.

And they reject all that is bought before their altar-throne-court.

Keep reminding us. You have Darwin, the Smithsonian and the ACLU on your side.
164 posted on 03/12/2007 1:10:13 AM PDT by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

To: si tacuissem

Prove how the first cell came into existence.


186 posted on 03/12/2007 2:40:55 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson