Indict him for trying trying to kill his wife in 1993, as he admitted to under oath.
And second, what did the MSM fail to report?
At this time, it is difficult to prove one way or the other. It is sort of like the coverage given to Nixon as compared to Clinton. It is slanted with intent to destroy or to preserve. It is what you find on the headlines that counts, not on page 6. The ability to influence thought is what the game is.
Well, I missed the confession, but if you have access to it, by all means file a criminal complaint against him, and I'm sure with all that evidence, it'll be an open and shut case. Never mind what the autopsy said.
At this time, it is difficult to prove one way or the other. It is sort of like the coverage given to Nixon as compared to Clinton. It is slanted with intent to destroy or to preserve. It is what you find on the headlines that counts, not on page 6. The ability to influence thought is what the game is.
Well, I tried. The fact is, that there were clearly two sides to this whole issue, including the events leading to her coma, the years of PVS, and the legal fight ultimately ending in her death. I honestly can't think of anything the MSM did or wrote that was slanted in any way. I believe there is little to nothing that I missed from the coverage, and in fact, for years, nothing came out on Michael Shiavo's side of things at all. I think it came down to two positions, the side favoring any action to save Terri, and the side that supported the rule of law.