According to court transcripts, $750 thousand of the settlement was put into trust for Terri's rehab, untouchable by Michael, leaving him with $300k, and it was over the argument of how the split would take place between Michael and Mr. Schindler that suddenly Michael was no longer the wonderful son-in-law. That is in court transcripts, and I'm not aware of any evidence refuting that. You may well be. And to be fair, I saw almost nothing of that reported by the MSM, which if they were on Michael's side, should have been reporting it constantly.
Now how could the MSM report anything that had to do with Terri's trust fund money when Michael's lawyers were taking it all? You aren't that naive, are you?
The "split" took place because Michael didn't want to spend any money on Terri's rehap. In fact, he wanted to kill her to collect that 750k for himself, as witnessed in court testimony in 1993.
Why not? It's in court records. As for naive, anyone who reads WND and reaches any conclusions has upped the ante on naivety. And I notice you didn't discuss the argument over the money between Michael and the Schindlers. I don't recall them denying it. Nor has anyone mentioned the offers Michael refused to turn his wife over to an agreed upon guardian...offers ranging from 1 to 10 million dollars. If Michael was interested in the money, why didn't he take the offers?
The "split" took place because Michael didn't want to spend any money on Terri's rehap. In fact, he wanted to kill her to collect that 750k for himself, as witnessed in court testimony in 1993.
I thought the MSM couldn't know about these things? And whose testimony was that?