Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lugsoul

Go ahead. Defend this.

This guy didn't just have a general political conflict of interest, he knew the witnesses. The judge should have dismissed him. Libby shouldn't have had to use any challenges against this guy -- unless he lied.

How many damned objections do you think they have?


62 posted on 03/07/2007 9:05:58 AM PST by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: AmishDude
For cause? They have as many as they need. They didn't even try with this guy. They wanted him on the jury.

We KNEW before the trial started that this guy worked at the WaPo and that he used to work for Woodward. It came out in voir dire, and it was reported. The defense decided they wanted him anyway.

69 posted on 03/07/2007 9:29:31 AM PST by lugsoul (Livin' in fear is just another way of dying before your time. - Mike Cooley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson