So. in your book calling somebody a homosexual is a slur then? How about being a homosexual is that a bad thing too?
For the record, Ann's definition of the slang is correct - it's a synonym for Wuss and that was clearly the context in which it was used in order to make a broader point about the insanity of semantic totalitarianism and the political correct culture of word rehab.
It's not a slur. If they're a faggot, then they're a faggot. They chose their behavior, remember? Faggot is a valid word to describe their behavior.
Homosexual behavior is a bad thing. Love the sinner, but hate the sin.
I object to their over use of antibiotics from ingesting bile and using strange, foreign instruments in their bodies( My sister in law is a nurse, and you wouldn't believe some of the stuff the hospitals pull out of these people).
I object to their incurable plagues. My kids have to grow up in this world, and homosexual behavior is like a walking petri dish, with more plagues yet to come.
When you play in the sewer too long, you get sick. You can also spread that sickness to the innocent people around you.
Yes, I object to their behavior because of the health issues associated with it. AIDs is a mutating disease. No one knows how it will eventually end - if it ever does. A simple change of behavior could eradicate the disease overnight, but no one wants to discuss that idea. Instead, they pay billions to find a cure.
What has homosexuality ever done that was good? We've seen the damage the behavior has done over and over, but what good has ever resulted from it? Why should I just look the other way and call it "normal?"