"We are not talking about tigers. We are talking about political candidates and Catholic teaching. Your point is not served by your illustration with tigers."
I never actually expected you to get it. While my post was directed toward you based on your belief we should continue to vote for the lesser of two evils, my point was to demonstrate to others how the lesser evil eventually consumes us all anyway. While he might eat a little less and chew a little slower in the beginning, he will eventually make large gains on the other glutenous man eating tiger as his appetite becomes ever so increasingly insatiable.
Fascinating. But unrelated to choosing between the lesser of two evils so that, while someone bad might move forward, at least it will not be the worst one.