Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve_Seattle

I'm no lawyer, but lawyers are smart enough to put people like this on the stand under other auspices, even when a judge says certain things are "off limits." If nothing else, I would think they could be called as rebuttal witnesses to Russert or one of the others who said they "heard it" from Libby. But if the issue is that Libby said, flatly, he did not TALK to Russert, and they proved he did, he's in heap big trouble.


492 posted on 03/06/2007 9:46:37 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies ]


To: LS
"But if the issue is that Libby said, flatly, he did not TALK to Russert, and they proved he did, he's in heap big trouble."

Libby did not deny talking to Russert. They disagreed about what was said during the conversation. Libby said Russert mentioned Plame; Russert - who couldn't remember anything else Wells questioned him about - said he didn't.
571 posted on 03/06/2007 9:56:17 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson