To: Steve_Seattle
I'm no lawyer, but lawyers are smart enough to put people like this on the stand under other auspices, even when a judge says certain things are "off limits." If nothing else, I would think they could be called as rebuttal witnesses to Russert or one of the others who said they "heard it" from Libby. But if the issue is that Libby said, flatly, he did not TALK to Russert, and they proved he did, he's in heap big trouble.
492 posted on
03/06/2007 9:46:37 AM PST by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: LS
"But if the issue is that Libby said, flatly, he did not TALK to Russert, and they proved he did, he's in heap big trouble."
Libby did not deny talking to Russert. They disagreed about what was said during the conversation. Libby said Russert mentioned Plame; Russert - who couldn't remember anything else Wells questioned him about - said he didn't.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson