To: homer777
the factual error is right there in the referral - she wasn't undercover. once that was established, the case was over.
To: oceanview
If she was undercover, covert, classified, ect, LE would determine if it was done intentionally, and if so they would have got Armitage and Novak for committing a crime.
They did not pursue them because it did not serve a political purpose.
To: oceanview
"the factual error is right there in the referral - she wasn't undercover. once that was established, the case was over." Yet Fitz today (outside the courtroom) stated that in the referral her position was "classified."
Is Fitz lying? Did he lie in his closing argument?
Please walk me through the establishing of the fact that she was not undercover.
1,142 posted on
03/06/2007 11:58:43 AM PST by
cookcounty
(How odd. Lee Hamilton now employed by Sandy Berger: stonebridge-international.com)
To: oceanview
When and how did it get "established?"
Do you have anything other than comments by media whores to make your point? Like actual evidence?
1,164 posted on
03/06/2007 12:21:59 PM PST by
lugsoul
(Livin' in fear is just another way of dying before your time. - Mike Cooley)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson