Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dmw
another family feud being played out while terrorists are trying to figure out how to bring us down.

Seems you are willfully "unremembering" the shennagins of Patty Davis and Ron Reagan Jr. during the Reagan era.

Guess you've not heard about partying with the Bush twins, or Jenna Bush's forged prescriptions, or the rest of it.

Selective memory. Obvious to anyone reading your post.

79 posted on 03/06/2007 5:55:06 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: angkor

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/03/apclintongays070305/

Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton told the nation’s leading gay rights group in an unpublicized speech that she wants a partnership with gays if elected president.

Clinton also said she opposes the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy regarding gays in the military that was instituted during her husband’s presidency.

“I am proud to stand by your side,” Clinton said in a keynote speech Friday to the Human Rights Campaign. Neither Clinton’s campaign nor her Senate office made any announcement that she would be making the Friday address.

Asked twice at a Monday campaign stop in Iowa why she did not publicize her speech to the group, Clinton said: “You’ll have to ask my campaign.”

In the speech, Clinton joked that she shares the same initials as the group, and pledged to maintain the same close working relationship that last year helped defeat the federal amendment which would have banned same-sex marriage.

“I want you to know that this is exactly the kind of partnership we will have when I am president,” Clinton told the group. “I want you to know that just as you always have an open door to my Senate office, you will always have an open door to the White House and together we can continue this journey.”

Clinton’s husband Bill Clinton was president when the Pentagon instituted the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, which says gays may serve in the military only if they keep their sexual orientation private. In 1999, as she prepared to run for the Senate from New York, Clinton publicly opposed that policy.

Previous to Bill Clinton’s administration, gays were flatly forbidden from serving in the military.

Sen. Clinton said it would be safer for the nation if openly gay soldiers, sailors, Marines, and airmen could wear the uniform.

“This policy doesn’t just hurt gays and lesbians, it hurts all our troops and this to me is a matter of national security and we’re going to fix it,” Clinton said.

Her chief rivals for the Democratic nomination, John Edwards and Barack Obama, also favor repealing the policy.

She also criticized the Bush administration for making political appeals based on gay rights issues, vowing that her presidency would mark “the end of leadership that has politicized the most personal and intimate issues.”

Human Rights Campaign vice president David Smith said Clinton’s comments were “very well received,” though he added the group is not endorsing any candidate and does not anticipate making an endorsement “anytime soon.”

Clinton spokesman Blake Zeff said Tuesday the candidate “affirmed her desire to have a strong partnership with the community as president,” adding they were “delighted” the speech was available on the Internet.

Clinton aides said no announcement was made because the group’s gathering is traditionally closed to the press. Video of the speech was posted on the group’s Web site.

Smith said such annual board meetings have always been closed to the press, but it was the first time he could remember that a speech at such a meeting had been made public afterward.

“There’s no contradiction,” he said. “The event is always closed to the press and we wanted to make (the remarks) available for people to see.”

Clinton spent Monday in Iowa, telling workers energy independence is critical to the country’s future and similar to the U.S. fight against communism during the Cold War.

“Today we know that we have to move away from our dependence on foreign oil. Everyone says that,” she said. “Our problem is figuring out how we would actually do it.”


81 posted on 03/06/2007 5:57:28 AM PST by Nick Thimmesch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: angkor

You seem to be another person who specializes in the art of assumption. Don't you know what they say about people who ass-u-me?

When I said, "another family feud" who do you think I was talking about? Yes, the Reagans, the feud between Billy and Hillary (Monicagate), to a lesser extent the Bush twins. Nothing selective about my memory.

I can be honest enough to admit the facts, sadly, your man can do no wrong in your eyes. Go ahead and believe what you want about Rudy, but the facts speak for themselves and nothing you can say will change it.


150 posted on 03/06/2007 6:37:48 AM PST by dmw (Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson