Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Liz

We have been fortunate, for the last six years, to have had a President with a fine family. That is important. To realize how it makes a difference, contrast it with eight years of Clinton drama.

And, to those who bring up the Reagans; Yes, they had a daughter who was a little bit of a problem child. I didn't really like that, either. But President and Mrs. Reagan had been happily married for twenty-eight years on election day in 1980. Mrs. Reagan was an outstanding first lady.

Rudy, on the other hand, has been married to his third wife, Judith Nathan, since 2003. Nathan carried on an affair with Giuliani for several years before his marriage to Donna Hanover ended. While some might disagree with me that a first lady should not be the type of woman who would carry on with another woman's husband, there is no doubt that Giuliani's family life is a problem.

Were he to be elected President, the country would get a steady dose of his family drama, which we honestly do not need in the White House.


45 posted on 03/06/2007 5:06:29 AM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: advance_copy; jla; Spiff
Nice take.

Social conservatives abhor this type of behavior. Those conservatives who support family values MUST be silenced.......the Extrme Makeover Plan for the Repuub party is beginning to be more visible.

Rudy is the linchpin in The Plan to dump social conservatives overboard. The goal is to remake the Republican party into a Democratic clone.

Do we really need a second Democrat party?

48 posted on 03/06/2007 5:14:37 AM PST by Liz (Hunter: For some candidates, a conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it is my hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: advance_copy
The Reagan's did have probably the Best marriage I have ever seen I am not disputing that. But they did have some problems with some of their kids. IMO every family does and it's a non issue, but people on both sides did make a big (and some still do) deal out of it.

And as far as Mrs. Nathan goes, Whether Rudy or Hildebeast wins, their will be a adulterer for the First Spouse, the only difference is one will be a former commander in chief who was complicit in allowing our nation to be attacked, committing perjury, and selling state secrets to the CHICOMS, and the other is just a skank. And she wont demand to be "co-presidents" either.
54 posted on 03/06/2007 5:19:06 AM PST by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: advance_copy
Were he to be elected President, the country would get a steady dose of his family drama, which we honestly do not need in the White House.

There are a lot of things about Rudy that are hard to swallow. When it comes to maintaining public order, he has a mean streak that would be useful in prosecuting the WOT. He's a cold dude and not the "twit" that some think he is.

273 posted on 03/06/2007 8:15:10 AM PST by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson