[rabscuttle385]

Sometimes the facts are so overwhelming on one side that it's unfair and inaccurate to give equal weight to both sides...

Goodhue is an idiot for writing such a thing. Just because *SOME* of the relevant "facts" imply a man-made cause for global warming does not necessarily mean that *ALL* of the facts imply such a thing.

But the scientific mind is not incurious in the manner of, say, Heidi Cullen. The scientific impulse is to see settled beliefs as potential targets of opportunity.

Science is about questioning established notions, making observations and conducting relevant, ethical experiments that can be analyzed to produce new insights into how our world operates. Religion, on the other hand, is the exact opposite.

...

The socialist-environmentalist religion has an agenda, and they will cherry-pick facts, ignore data, and distort numbers to fit that agenda...and then attempt to silence anyone who dares to questions them.

[clueless123]

Just because *SOME* of the relevant "facts" imply a man-made cause for global warming does not necessarily mean that *ALL* of the facts imply such a thing.



Actually, the relevant "facts" don't even imply a man-made cause especially when one considers that one volcano puts out more volume of "greenhouse gases" than all the world's industry ever did. And the number one on the list of greenhouse gases is water vapor.

But oops, I forgot, the debate is over.