"Your graphic claims Hillary's position on Iraq is the same as Rudy... Says she "Supports - voted for it"."
No, it doesn't, that's why the colors are different and the disclaimer is there.
How about pointing out the disclaimer that says Hillary's position on Iraq has changed from what is being advertised? I don't see it...
Anyway her position on Iraq has been soft for months before her big flip last month.
If your proof point graphic is so important to your case, why don't you make it correct instead of hiding behind an 'imaginary disclaimer' or 'color coding'?