Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone

"It doesn't really matter who is President concerning this particular issue. "

But it does matter in the people he gets to appoint to the supreme court. Does a president who thinks the 2nd amendment is a state and local control issue merely because it currently lacks 'incorporation' going to appoint judges who agree or disagree with that position?


37 posted on 03/03/2007 4:28:43 PM PST by flashbunny (<--- Free Anti-Rino graphics! See Rudy the Rino get exposed as a liberal with his own words!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: flashbunny
Well, it matters, but I'm not certain it's worth sitting in a puddle of gasoline and smoking about.

There's something about judges. They just won't tell you how they'll rule 15 years from now on any issue. Somehow they have the notion that they're an equal branch of government. WHICH THEY ARE.

It drives me nuts. It drives everyone here nuts. What are you going to do about it? Can we find a President who will guarantee us that the Supreme Court will make an enormous landmark decision?

I dunno. I'd like to see some sort of Charleton Heston clone get the the nomination.

I'm not here pimping for Rudy. His probable nomination is absolutely destroying this forum. It's almost painful to log on here. I want the White Knight that I doubt will appear. But it's not late for him to come riding in.

I think though, that the worst choice we could make for the nominee is McCain. Rudy scares me far less.

You just have to play the cards you're dealt.

46 posted on 03/03/2007 4:49:25 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson