You would be correct .. he was dealing with a city rampant with killings and his gun control had nothing to do with a person's normal rights to own a weapon and use it.
And .. he also believes it should be a state's issue .. and it should conform to the 2nd Amendment.
So why did he yank the gun permits of **27,000** law abiding people?
Do you believe that Rudy's gun control positions "conform to the second amendment"? Does a strict assault weapon ban "conform to the second amendment"? Sane, law abiding citizens denied the right to own handguns "conforms to the second amendment"? This type of gun control has plenty to do with a person's normal rights to own a weapon and use it.
Please, explain how disarming sane, law-abiding citizens is a rational method for "dealing with a city rampant with killings".
I like Rudy, and he's better than most blue state politicians on most issues- way better than Hillary or Barack, but let's be honest about his gun control positions. They are very much the Democrat positions. I find it hard to believe that he wouldn't sign any gun control legislation that crosses his desk. He's a free market guy, but he's not a bill of rights guy. Not that there are many bill of rights guys to choose from among the front runners.