To: redangus
Fred voted to NOT convict Bill Clinton. I cannot forgive that vote.
To: mariabush
Actually, that's not entirely correct. I believe Fred voted "not guilty" as to the perjury charge, but voted "guilty" to the obstruction of justice charge.
642 posted on
03/02/2007 5:13:06 PM PST by
NinoFan
(Rudy Lovers: The Rosie O'Donnell Wing of the Republican Party)
To: mariabush
You might consider this.
If Clinton had been convicted (which I dearly hoped for and which he should have been by all rights), algore would have been president.
That would most probably have led to algore's election in 2000.
The Lord works in mysterious ways.
676 posted on
03/02/2007 5:39:32 PM PST by
altura
To: mariabush
There is no perfect candidate. I personally would have voted to throw the SOB out, but if that is the worst you can say about the man then he must be a pretty solid choice.
I look at his votes on Abortion, gun control, taxes, lifestyle issues, military/foreign policy and trade, his ability to articulate the conservative message and see a man who can WIN and govern from the right side of the political spectrum. I won't throw all that away just because he didn't vote to kick Clinton out of office. Geez talk about a single issue voter.
To: mariabush
Fred voted to NOT convict Bill Clinton. I cannot forgive that vote.At this point what candidate would be better?
793 posted on
03/02/2007 9:13:20 PM PST by
FreeReign
(Still looking for the best conservative candidate.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson