Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: okie01

Thank you. The Cheney quote proves my point, especially the entire second paragraph.

They didn't anticipate the resistance, didn't anticipate the sectarian violence, and thought that the only thing our troops had to fear was the Republican Guard.

Russert might have used the word "liberators" first, but Dick Cheney's smart enough to not repeat it (twice!) unless he thought it apt.

You also didn't address the fact that the Administration under-staffed the war, providing fewer troops than many generals wanted.

Let's face facts - the Administration expected a very different kind of war than we have been fighting. The pre-war plans turned out to be totally inadequate, or Rumsfeld wouldn't have been fired and we wouldn't need the troop surge noe.

And W sold the American public on the kind of war he thought we were going to fight, not the war we ended up in.


51 posted on 03/06/2007 7:03:48 AM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: highball
Sorry, I just don't read it the way you do.

"Welcomed as liberators" could be construed as an ill-advised overstatement...as a sound bit, but not as an expression of policy or expectations.

Looking at the entire quote -- and recalling the background of the President's pronouncements on the issue -- I'm not troubled by Cheney's comment...at all.

Perhaps, it is a matter of "nuance"...

52 posted on 03/07/2007 1:47:04 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson