Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hydroshock; B Knotts; Peach
Agreed, it is still a long ways before the first primary. Keep in mind at this time in 1991 Slick Willie was at 2%.

I know you keep making that argument, but in so many ways this is NOT 1992.

This is the first Presidential year since 1952 that there is not either an incumbent or sitting VP in the race.

Add to that the factor of the Internet (and the joy of YouTube), the front loaded primaries, 24-hour news...we're in a post 9/11 environment.

I'm not saying things couldn't change. They certainly could overnight.

At the same time, I just don't think you can compare this to any other year.

39 posted on 03/01/2007 10:05:51 AM PST by Corin Stormhands (Al Gore needs to reduce his carbon butt-print.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Corin Stormhands

I think 1992 is a very apt comparison. Bush the Elder lurched leftward and lost that year by splitting the party. Just like Rudy would if he won.


45 posted on 03/01/2007 10:10:27 AM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Corin Stormhands

The more I am looking at Newt I think he will come in late summer or early fall say better labor day and Halloween. Then it becomes a new ballgame.


49 posted on 03/01/2007 10:12:58 AM PST by Hydroshock (Duncan Hunter For President, checkout gohunter08.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson