We can leave it where it is, and I'm not trying to pester you. But I am always curious what consitutes "definitive proof" for different people that are skeptical.
When there is even the possibility that science is incapable of developing a model that takes into consideration all the variables that exist in the earth's climate, in order to perform their evaluations, then I am skeptical. And that is one large issue in today's debate.
And when I come upon an individual who is so 'certain' of one side or the other when others of repute remain skeptical, I say 'ya, sure'.
So, as you say, 'let's leave it where it is'.