Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
You said WHAT you are for, but never answered my question of WHO are you For?

Is there a single candidate who meets all your criteria AND has a chance of winning this crucial election? If so, I'd like a name.

354 posted on 02/28/2007 11:43:58 AM PST by Carolinamom (Whatever you voted for, you did not vote for failure -- President Bush SOTU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies ]


To: Carolinamom

I answered your question quite succinctly. If that answer wasn't sufficient for you, tough.

Now, quit lying and putting words in my mouth. It's a nasty liberal tactic. Thanks.


373 posted on 02/28/2007 11:49:44 AM PST by EternalVigilance ("Liberalism": Now in two delicious Party Flavors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies ]

To: Carolinamom
Is there a single candidate who meets all your criteria AND has a chance of winning this crucial election? If so, I'd like a name.

The "and has a chance of winning" part is the poison pill the RINOs use to tank any legitimate conservative candidate. However, we all know anyone has a chance of winning, and the only conservatve Republican to hold the presidency in the last 30 years is also the only Republican in that time to win overwhelmingly.

390 posted on 02/28/2007 11:56:49 AM PST by Texas Federalist (Gingrich '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson