[Al Simmons]

Hi Jim. Last night I found this post by Common Tator quite accidentally. I thought it could really help to elevate the debate after the last two Rudy threads. Hope you agree with the need to return the conversation to a less heated tone around here.

Lets discuss the ideas he submits for consideration instead of personalities.

I don't keep ping lists, but I'd wager most of the folks on the earlier threads would find this one of interest (or irritation ;>)

So feel free to ping whoever you think might want to chime in.

Thanks as always.

[b4its2late]

ping

[Wonder Warthog]

"Lets discuss the ideas he submits for consideration instead of personalities."

But those are precisely the problem---pro-queer, anti-gun, pro-baby killing. Those are not "moderate" positions--they are flat out "progressive".

About the only way that Rudy would be acceptable to me is if Gingrich is his running-mate.

[woofie]

bump

[OKIEDOC]

Thanks for posting the article.

I agree and have said these these same comments for years.

Rush and other radio personalities have said that those who say they will not vote unless......are either childish or naivete about American politics.

The narrow minded fundamentalist jihadists Republican party member will never catch on that these childish comments about not voting is like bending over, grabbing your ankles and letting one of Nancy Pelosers San Francisco supporters show you physically why not voting is no good.

To me anyone who would refuse to vote for an accused RINO over a known left wing socialists liberal is a traitor to themselves and to future generations of Americans.

Not one of the current crop of left wing Democrat candidates is:

STRONG ON AMERICA.

RESPECTS AMERICA'S TRADITIONAL VALUES.

AMERICA FIRST.