Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: colorado tanker
I was not old enough to vote in that period, but was aware. I voted for Nixon in his second term.

I can't believe what has happened to the political base. it's so senseless that I first thought it humorous, until I realized that the disease ran very deep in the base.

We have always differed within the base, but we always put it aside to vote in the general elections, and we did this as a minority party under much pressure during those days.

Now, things have markedly changed, with so much acidity directed by the social conservatives and the libertines (to a lesser degree)directly toward the WRONG targets!

Rather than take on their counterpart legitimate enemy within the Democrat base, they chose to direct their fire at the base and it's supporting political structure. They have essentially sawed off the limb that they were sitting on, and now blame the tree. They do this in the name of the Constitution, principle, God and victory for the Founder's, much is the same vain as any radical element that gets involved in a political fight. As such, political history, common sense and compromise are the first casualties in the fight.

The problem with this sort of thinking, is that it has never worked. It has always resulted in defeat, and is very hard to come back from. (just ask the Dem's)

IMO, it is all academic at this point. This political base will require total remodeling and reconstruction, and this will take a few election cycles to accomplish. The problem is that we have not yet hit bottom, and will be forced to endure this cycle before the 2008 smack-down. For those of us who have watched this develop and tried to stop it for years, the next two years will be very painful.

248 posted on 02/28/2007 10:51:49 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]


To: Cold Heat
This political base will require total remodeling and reconstruction, and this will take a few election cycles to accomplish.

Yeah, I've seen your intellectual-sounding arguments for "remodeling" conservatism out of the Republican Party before.

Can you say "Whigs?"

267 posted on 02/28/2007 10:59:11 AM PST by EternalVigilance ("Liberalism": Now in two delicious Party Flavors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]

To: Cold Heat
Ideological purity is impossible in a coalition as diverse as modern conservatism. We have social conservatives, national defense/foreign policy hawks, fiscal/small government conservatives, libertarians, big business, small business, paleo-conservatives, combinations of the same, and I'm sure I'm leaving some out. We agree on 80% of our goals and when we are unified we can accomplish most of what we want.

Contrast that with 1960 when the party was mostly folks whose families had voted Republican since the Civil War with main street and country club conservatives thrown in, and was a chronic minority in Congress that had not elected a real conservative President since Coolidge.

380 posted on 02/28/2007 11:53:01 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson