You managed to get the "chestnuts out of the fire" bollixed up, when attempting to apply it.
And trying to put words in my mouth won't cut it either! Yes, I am against abortion, but there are some circumstances where it is necessary...ectopic pregnancies being a desperate circumstance that requires one.
BTW, Hunter has the same stance as Rudy does, on partial birth abortions...ban them, EXCEPT FOR THE LIFE OF THE MOTHER. Don't tell me that there is no such need; tell that to Hunter, I guess that that makes him and all of his supporters here, abortionists too.
And yes, I do know how to ping people.
See below.
Well the way you right it, yea. But I take my time and can usually tell what you mean.
I do type what I am thinking, but I take a little time to make sure it will be understood by rational people.
You managed to get the "chestnuts out of the fire" bollixed up, when attempting to apply it.
No, nopardons, it was you that created the confuzion, not me. The chestnuts in the fire were yours...in that you spun use of a word to your own purposes.
BTW, Hunter has the same stance as Rudy does, on partial birth abortions
That is patently untrue. You have been corrected on that already:
Posting that lie AGAIN, after being corrected?
Giuliani did NOT support the PBA ban which included a provision for the life of the mother.
Hunter voted FOR the ban, AND believes in the sanctity of life from conception.
I would provide a link but you don't do links.
There are rare exceptions where the life of the mother is in danger. Then and only then (if it is really a fact) I could agree with that provision.
Other causes, I don't think it is called for. Ethyl Waters is one example. Many here would have supported her being killed in the womb.
tell that to Hunter, I guess that that makes him and all of his supporters here, abortionists too.
For those that take all you say as gospel truth, I imagine they would think that. Sad.
Only one definition for abortionist: Baby Killers. I think there are two of you here that still believe that.