Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: upsdriver; youngjim
"The fact that Pete Sessions would endorse Giulianni means that deep down he wasn't ever that opposed to abortion but was only pandering to his constituents. What a pity!"

...ummm... might it ALSO mean that he instead realizes that in the order of priorities national survival against the creeping Islamofascist and Iranian nuclear terror is an issue paramount over all others, hence the man most trustworthy to handle it should be elected?

Its a rhetorical question. I do not expect you to answer it honestly, because then you'd have to take back a lot of stuff said on this thread already.

1,665 posted on 03/01/2007 12:13:43 AM PST by Al Simmons (Why Rudy in 2008? Because National Security should not be left to children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1623 | View Replies ]


To: Al Simmons

No, I stand by my explaination


1,666 posted on 03/01/2007 12:18:16 AM PST by upsdriver ((Hunter for Pres/ Ann Coulter Sec, of State))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1665 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson