[youngjim]

And you are??? an interested observer and participant on this very long thread. Why do you ask?

PREMISE I never used the word "treasonous liberals" to anyone.

CONCLUSION My point is STILL valid, don't vote for someone just because you got your feelings hurt over a couple of words.

I don't want to confuse you, but this is called equivocation and its a common logical fallacy. In your premise you state X. Then your conclusion cites Y as true--with absolutely nothing to link X and Y but your banal fancy. As any decent judge would ask "Is there a question in there, or is counsel speculating?

PSYCHO-FREEP can answer you if he wants; educating the twits is yet another service I provide.

[dmw]

"...educating the twits is yet another service I provide."

Reading some of your posts indicates otherwise. I don't think anyone here has learned squat from you. You may have the ability to use fancy words (hot air), but from reading your posts it is quite evident that you don't have an ounce of common sense in your head.

The only service you seem to providing here lately is that of making a fool of yourself with your asinine mumbo jumbo. But don't let me stop you from exposing yourself for the puny fool you are.