I on the other hand see a debacle in Nov 2008 if we do not nominate someone with cross-party appeal like Rudy - and the result of that would be worse than surrender - that would mean occupation by a power hell-bent on imposing a foreign ideology (Marxism in sheep's clothing) on the country. And you know her name.
I'm with Mia T. on this. Hitlary is coming, and we better focus on the real enemy or may God save us.
Rudy will not take our rights away, nor try to, but SHE already has tried it before and will again - only this time she will have the reins of POWER in HER hands.
Don't miss seeing the forest for the trees Jim. What's coming down the pike from the left is scary as shale (so to speak).
Thank you for that fine representation Colonel!
Whatever you say. Electing an abortionist is not surrendering to abortion. Got it.
the republican base alone, cannot elect a president. hell, the republican base, the social consservatives - couldn't even muster enough votes to return Jim Talent to the Senate from Missouri, in a state where a socon issue like stem cell research, was key in the race.
no matter how many times its posted - the demographics, and the analytical analsys of the electorate - isn't going to change in time for the 2008 election.
the US is a center/right nation. conservatives can either be part of a coalition that elects a president, or sit home and hand it to the Dems.