[JCEccles]

Here's a litmus test, one propounded by the Rudy rooters themselves:

Prove that only Rudy can competently fight the War on Terror. Opinions don't count. Give us hard evidence. Why, among all the potential candidates, is Rudy the only one who will defend this nation and its people?

The rest of your bunch don't have the courage to make the case. Do you?

[Miss Marple]

The best evidence I can give you (and I am not supporting Guiliani or anyone else) is that he has amassed a lot of support which is tied to his no-nonsense attitude with Arafat, the Saudi Prince, and crime-fighting.

I think his tough-guy image would inspire confidence in people (although that part is simply my opinion). On numerous occasions he has supported the President on the war without any of the waffling I have seen from Brownback and Romney.

[Sunsong]

See post #1329. I'm have no interest in trying to get you to support anyone or not support anyone. You support whoever you choose. I am interested in how people who disagree treat each other. We're on a whole different wave length.