I'm willing to keep an open mind on Rudy but perahps you can explain something to me:
Rudy said he'll appoint strict contstructionists, or originalists to the courts and yet he supports RvW which is the mother of all court activism.
How can someone balance such apparent cognitive dissonance?
Or is that merely a sop to conservatives to allow them to pretend they're not really seeing what they're seeing?
I had one of them explain it to me, so I graphed it out: