Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob Mc

Well explosive rounds are another problem - iirc there is a $200 destructive device 'tax' for everything that goes 'boom' outside a barrel.

Not sure if there is anything that outright bans modern artillery, but they would be over the .50 caliber limit and not a shotgun - therefore subject to more regulations.

Been a long time since I;ve read about cannon ownership but I believe old style cannons are allowed due to them being black powder devices.


175 posted on 02/24/2007 8:16:05 PM PST by flashbunny (<----- Click here if you hate RINOs! 2008 GOP RINO cards!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: flashbunny

Yes, I've ready stories about these "cannon shoots". Sounds like fun.


179 posted on 02/24/2007 8:19:14 PM PST by Bob Mc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

To: flashbunny
Not sure if there is anything that outright bans modern artillery, but they would be over the .50 caliber limit and not a shotgun - therefore subject to more regulations.

Anything over .5" and not a "sporting" shotgun. Twelve-gauge shotguns that are deemed "unsporting" by the BATF are taxed as destructive devices.

I'm somewhat surprised that nobody's come up with a good bull-pup 28ga shotgun for home defense. A fixed choke could have a diameter of 0.495" so as to avoid the "destructive device" classification, and a 28ga shell should provide a somewhat useful payload (especially if there were standard 3.5" and 4" lengths).

240 posted on 02/24/2007 9:35:33 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson