[PSYCHO-FREEP]

That's because you are very limited on your knowledge of this forum.

In 2000, the exact same thing happened over the candidate George W Bush. The vile and venom is about the same. Many W supporters were banned then also, as have been this time around.

The hate for W still exists here and the comparison of the nasty nature of DU with FR has never changed, with the exception of language allowed for posters to use. DU has no restrictions on fowl language.

I'm sure Ronald Reagan would have had the same negativity if this forum were around during his Presidency. Many here are just not open to other peoples beliefs or ideas. They also tend to be the very hardest to the right on the conservative spectrum. In fact, anyone not exactly in line with their rigid way of thinking, are "RINOS". They also have a tendency to label other people who they don't agree with or who share a different outlook than they do.

[toddlintown]

RINO.

[mr_hammer]

"They also tend to be the very hardest to the right on the conservative spectrum. In fact, anyone not exactly in line with their rigid way of thinking, are "RINOS"."

It's called morals and or a defined set of values...something moderates can't seemed to grasp. Moderates tilt with the wind, having no set of values except what is in vougue at the time.

I have some shread of respect for the far left, because they are at least working from core beliefs...as nutty as they are.

Again, IMO.

[tcostell]

You know.. you're probably right... Reagan would have been trashed every time he leaned left. We'd have celebrated like mad when he fired the Air Traffic controllers, and pushed the commies into a corner, but where he gave in, we'd have trashed him.

Goes with the territory I guess.

[philman_36]

...restrictions on fowl language.
Bird brain!

[wku man]

"DU has no restrictions on fowl language."

Yeah, they squawk and cluck a lot over there! Most of what's said resembles what's at the bottom of my parrots' cage every morning.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!