To: FairOpinion
The author hits on the KEY and really ONLY important considerations: two things: national security, and Hillary Clinton's Supreme Court appointments.
OK, what are Rudy's national security credentials beyond his performance on 9/11?
And there is no guarantee that Hillary is going to get the nomination, that whole 'Hillary's Supreme Court Appointments gambit is nothing but a straw man argument.
16 posted on
02/23/2007 7:20:01 PM PST by
mkjessup
(If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
To: mkjessup
So whom do you think ANY of the Democrats will appoint to the Supreme Court?!
21 posted on
02/23/2007 7:22:24 PM PST by
FairOpinion
(Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
To: mkjessup
OK, what are Rudy's national security credentials beyond his performance on 9/11? He thumbed his nose at the law and Congress to keep a couple hundred thousand illegal alien foreign nationals in his city.
Doesn't that count for something?
;-)
22 posted on
02/23/2007 7:22:54 PM PST by
EternalVigilance
(“Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair; the rest is in the hands of God.”)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson