Replies

Okay...

You are correct, it could have already of happened.

Therefore I purpose that the suit must be given merit (not laughed out of the courtroom) with the end result in favor of the petitioner/s (no segregation/seperate bathrooms).

It doesnt have to be all over the US or in every school district. Just one, such as this article.

Alarmist? Are you joking? LOL

I am not discussing the decline of our entire society (thats a whole 'nother discussion) I am discussing the homosexual agenda.

The progression of this movement is the reality. Am I to believe then, that things will move backward in this regard over the next 10-20 years?

It'll never happen:-)

Therefore Ill take your bet, but I think making it monetary makes little sense. By the time 2050 rolls around (the other half of our conversation) I will be in my mid 80's.

If we both happen to still be around FR in 10-20 year for the firts half then I purpose the loser has to run around with something ridiculously stupid in thier tagline, chosen by the winner :-)

We need to be realistic, but it doesnt hurt to have fun.

Therefore I purpose that the suit must be given merit (not laughed out of the courtroom) with the end result in favor of the petitioner/s (no segregation/seperate bathrooms). It doesnt have to be all over the US or in every school district. Just one, such as this article.

I think that right now, you could find a single bathroom in the US that isn't seperate. Therefore, I propose the following benchmark: 40% of the bathrooms will not be seperate in 2030 (that is your claim).

Alarmist? Are you joking? LOL

My dear lady, you are the one claiming that pedophilia will be more accepted in 44 years time. I cannot blame you for thinking that. You read about children who have been abused all the time, and you pull the hair out of your head from distress. However, it is worthy to note that strides have been made in the last 30 years. Pedophilia has become less accepted than it was 30 years ago. I have seen a lot of references to leftist politicians, leftist platforms in Europe saying that sexual intercourse between teenagers and adults of any age should be legal, or that child pornography should be legal. That was in the 70's. Now, you don't have that. The sexual revolution caused a moment of moral confusion, so to say, when the boundaries of society were being tested. What would we accept, and what would we not accept? We concluded that pedophilia is not acceptable (I was a child back then, so don't blame me). And if you look at what the direction of the country is, it is indisputably moving into the direction of harsher laws for pedophiles, and thank God that it is.

I am not discussing the decline of our entire society (thats a whole 'nother discussion) I am discussing the homosexual agenda. The progression of this movement is the reality. Am I to believe then, that things will move backward in this regard over the next 10-20 years?

This 'movement' is not a force that you cannot grasp. Think of yourself, why has this movement been so successful? Because it has managed to win the hearts and minds of at least part of the American people. Without that, they would be utterly powerless. Think of yourself: you think that gay people should be able to do what they want they want in private. Yet I bet that you don't think that pedophiles should be able to do what they want in private. You do see a difference. Queers don't hurt anyone, pedophiles do.That's why pedophiles will NEVER win anywhere near this level of public support, that is something I know.

Therefore Ill take your bet, but I think making it monetary makes little sense. By the time 2050 rolls around (the other half of our conversation) I will be in my mid 80's.

We're not making the bet to make more money. We're making the bet so that we can see who wins, and that winning will not be significant unless some symbolic sum is transferred to the other person. But I hope that when you were in your 80's, you would realize that you were being alarmist, that you worried for no reason.

If we both happen to still be around FR in 10-20 year for the firts half then I purpose the loser has to run around with something ridiculously stupid in thier tagline, chosen by the winner :-)

Sounds good to me.

We need to be realistic, but it doesnt hurt to have fun.

Indeed.