[scripter]

You found a reference to a study and from what you've said you're weighing your odds that I don't know what I'm talking about. Unfortunately for you I demonstrated you've done nothing but obfuscate, misdirect and thrown out many logical fallacies.

I very much encourage you and anybody to read the study you referenced. It doesn't support your position that genes play a huge role. Bailey and Pillard would be the first to tell you that so stop mirepresenting their study.

As I've previously said, you are demonstrating a profound ignorance on this subject. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. And I want everybody who follows this issue to see you for what you are: a time waster and game player.

[LtdGovt]

You found a reference to a study and from what you've said you're weighing your odds that I don't know what I'm talking about.

No, I was addressing another case when talking about weighing the odds.

Unfortunately for you I demonstrated you've done nothing but obfuscate, misdirect and thrown out many logical fallacies.

You may believe whatever it is that you wish to believe, as an American citizen. Even if there has not been any such demonstration.

I very much encourage you and anybody to read the study you referenced. It doesn't support your position that genes play a huge role. Bailey and Pillard would be the first to tell you that so stop mirepresenting their study.

I don't think I'm making any representation of their study. I rely on the interpretation by psychologists when it comes to psychological studies. While we're at it, I tend to trust their judgement over yours when it comes to their subject matter, but of course, my own judgement is superior for myself, so you need not worry, I'll read it for myself.

And I want everybody who follows this issue to see you for what you are: a time waster and game player.

That's something I've already refuted. Anyway, why did you not stop wasting your time on me?