well no- that is radio-carbon age- not 'real age' real age breaks down to a mere 4,000 to 7,000 year accuracy for carbon dating regardless of the methods used for carbon 14 detection- for older dates, science has to go to other controversial and innacurate dating methods that have problems all their own. A well known researcher said that "If creationists got their hands on the 14 points of assumptions that dating relies on, they'd have quite a case." Unfortunately for him though- Folks did get their hands on this info
It's to bad you don't accept carbon dating science. I am always pleasantly amazed how time after time modern scientific methods including carbon dating, used on archaeological digs verify the accounts of the Bible and the dates and locations of civilizations and events mentioned in the Bible.