[Gop1040]

"What part of the article is not true? Does truth only apply to publications that you personally approve?"

Then you must be on board also with this neo-Communist publication's mantra to "IMPEACH CHANEY THEN BUSH". With Rudy there's no accusation of anything illegal. Just innuendos. There's nothing new in this 2004 article or your Newsday article.

If guilt by association is your cup of tea, then we all are guilty. Give us a break.

[TommyDale]

So because it was said in 2004, now Kerik and Giuliani should be looked upon as if they have changed their character? You still cannot deny that the story is true. Giuliani is not suited to select someone to run the Homeland Security, and his business partners and dealings are a sham.

Is this really the best America can come up with for a Presidential candidate? Get serious. If Rudy has this much opposition from his own party, can you imagine the crap that will be tossed at him from the Democrats?