Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson
I read a piece today where he says he likes McCain-Feingold... only it has some loopholes that need fixin, ie, he wants to curtail our free speech rights even more. Now, that's kicking some butt!

Got a link? I've been wanting to write the guy a letter, just to ask him where he stands on certain issues. Unfortunately my printer died, and I'll be writing it on lined schoolbook paper. You know a president only has so much power, and the power he does have gets tied up in the House and Senate. The McInsane/Feingold bill pisses me off to no end. We'll see....

49 posted on 02/23/2007 4:49:38 AM PST by TheSpottedOwl (Are those coyotes I hear, or is Hillary singing again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: TheSpottedOwl

DP: Well, here's one possibility. My listeners know this, that this is actually rendered him, unfortunately, unvotable for me. And if I have him on, I will tell him that, and that is campaign finance reform, which has ensured that essentially, only multi-millionaires run for office in the United States of America, especially to the Senate, because I cannot...if I, Dennis Prager, who doesn't have any money, wanted to run, no millionaire could give me a million dollars. They could only give me $4,000 dollars. So you have any views on campaign finance reform?

RG: I think there's no question that the present McCain-Feingold law has had tremendous loopholes in it, that people have taken advantage of. And it needs to be corrected. It needs to be cured.

DP: So you would like to see it in place as well? You're also for...

RG: I would like to...but I think, in fairness to Senator McCain, that he has recognized some of the problems that maybe weren't foreseen in McCain-Feingold, and has promised to try to fix it. I don't know that that's happened.

DP: Well, let me then be specific. Why shouldn't people just be allowed to give any amount of money they want to any candidate, and just have it publicly known? Why should there be a law limiting that freedom?

RG: Well, I mean, there...I think there are very good arguments on either side of that. I've always lived under a campaign finance law that had limitations on it, so I'm sort of pretty comfortable with it. But the reality is that the Supreme Court has so far ruled on that, and I guess found McCain-Feingold...

DP: Unfortunately.

RG: ...found it Constitutional, although that was a pretty close vote.


http://dennisprager.townhall.com/Transcript_Page.aspx?ContentGuid=fac1ad6b-eaa1-45a2-b1c6-3fe2c099887d

Gotta go.


51 posted on 02/23/2007 4:55:49 AM PST by Jim Robinson (It's "originalists" not "constructionists.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson