You haven't addressed squat. You have made outlandish statements, refused to back them up even when challenged, and given a couple of links (often incorrect) to creationist "science" on apologetic websites.
Your record on these threads is so pathetic that I am wondering if you are an evolutionist deliberately trying to make creationists look bad, or if you are actually a group of college students sitting around drinking and trying to see how ridiculous a poster can get before somebody gets wise.
...bring up one point at a time, make a specific comment regarding science pointing to evolution, and you will be easily shown that it is not scientific fact. just one point at a time.
One point? OK, here is a point.
Homo ergaster is a transitional between earlier, more ape-like forms and later, more human-like forms.
...you are unwilling to do this because it makes it very clear when it is done this way. And thats just what evolurtionist propagandists are about making things anything BUT clear and specififc.
BS.
OK, I have made a clear point about evolution. Lets see the quality of your scholarship in rebutting that point. But be warned, creationist websites do not do science; they distort science to make the result come out the way they they "believe" it should. Posting a link to some half baked creationist website does not rebut my point. For that you need some real facts, not apologetics.
But be warned, creationist websites do not do science; they distort science to make the result come out the way they they "believe" it should.
Put another way:
But be warned, evolutionist websites do not do science; they distort science to make the result come out the way they they "believe" it should.
There. That's better.