Not talking about that site, oh my word! the carbon dating site I just showed you! anyways peace dude!
Do you mean this site:The Problem with Carbon 14 and other dating methods?
You didn't show this site, you gave a vague hint by giving a corrupted link...
The Problem with Carbon 14 and other dating methodshas to be scientific - it uses footnotes and stuff!
Granted, it's just three footnotes, but they show the wisdom of this remarkable essay. So, here they are, in their whole splendor and somewhat odd - but original - enumeration1:
Carbon dating references:
1) From a video Lecture by Dr. Kent Hovind2
6) Antarctic Journal, Washington
10) "Dry bones and other fossils" by Dr. Gary Parker
That's what the main point of The Problem with Carbon 14 and other dating methods
is about:
They know, that carbon dating won't give meaningful results for samples which are older than ~50,000 years. They do it non the less. And they do it again. And they claim that they have proved either that the world is less than 50,000 years old or that carbon dating doesn't work.
To get back to our little analogy: this is like claiming that their is either less than one litre of liquid or that it is impossible to measure the amount of one gallon...