Replies

Thats weak and just what I would expect from a cheese thinker! You wont debunk it trust me he has already debunked people who are just like you, even people who are the head of evolutionists organisations. So I can assue you, you wont! And as I mentioned he use to be an evolutionist, the reason you wont look him up is because all your interested in is your ego and your propaganda, thats why your here in the first place arguing, if it was absolute fact that evolution was true you wouldnt have to defend it it would be obvious to all, but the facts are it is not obvious. Its down right embarrasing for evolutionists all over again. But like I said before those who want to avoid consequences of sin, they invent an excuse.

"Thats weak and just what I would expect from a cheese thinker!"

Better a cheese thinker than a no thinker for whom everything is written or not existing.

"...if it was absolute fact that evolution was true you wouldnt have to defend it it would be obvious to all,..."

Nothing is absolute in science. You have a biblical truth filter installed. Only things can be true which won't hurt your reading of the bible. Like the non existing global flood. I'd like to mention dendrochronology again as one fact against a global flood.

"But like I said before those who want to avoid consequences of sin, they invent an excuse."

"You shall not make for yourself an image, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above,..."
That is what you are doing. You have made up an image of your good for yourself.

"Are constants realy constants?"
The vacuum speed of light c0 is set as a constant. The speed of light within media is not.

"Is red shift realy only caused by objects moving away from us?"

Not only but also.

"Does the red shift of light prove a big bang?"

Nothing will ever be proved in science. Just disprove like a global flood. The big bang is a good explanation for red shift like the theory of evolution is for the biology. Deities are out of science until you can verify them.

"OR does it prove that the earth is at the center of the universe?"

You can set your point of observation wherever you want.

"There is overwhelming evidence that light id not a true constant over time!!!! let alone where did all the mass and energy come from????"

Physics will adjust to this if there is enough data and evidence to form a hypothesis. Until now there is no evidence for a change in the decay rate due to magnetic fields. Just writing "overwhelming" proves nothing.

"You wont debunk it trust me..."

Why should I trust you? Cause you pretend to be a Christian? I won't have to debunk something you hide.

Until now I miss any kind of logic in your way of arguing. I only always read "You're wrong!", "You can't prove it!", "You won't debunk!" ... That and one old book of tales counts nothing in natural science.