The problem is that the evidence does show us a direction and point to a more reasonable reason to things, we dont have to keep searching for hundreds of years, the evidence is already overwhelmingly profound against evolution or even suggesting it to be a real theory to even remotely considered.
>>The problem is that the evidence does show us a direction and point to a more reasonable reason to things, we dont have to keep searching for hundreds of years, the evidence is already overwhelmingly profound against evolution or even suggesting it to be a real theory to even remotely considered.<<
I hear what you are saying but it directly contracts everything I hear from a dozen different scientific disciplines with the work double check in a dozen different countries.
I am prepared to accept that evolution from earlier and to more complex/later life forms is the methodology by which life has advanced. I'd feel a conflict with the bible - Abraham had no way of knowing the magnitude and age of the universe.
That said, its been nice to be able to have a friendly discussion even if we disagree.