Blind spot? what does that got to do with anything that shows evidence to a bad design, show me how it is a bad design, and not with oppion propaganda!
Chickens have genetics for teeth because thats in there gene pool from there original KIND, but there is no adding to the gene pool, and they could be flightless from a lot of breeding dominant and recessive genes, that means nothing, Penguins are flightless birds also but they swim very well.
Who says the human jaw is to small? you! over time people could have become recessive gene reasons, and perhaps you might know that in early days in the bible it mentions that mankind lived from five hundred to nine hundred + years of age people can have dispositions for disease or problems or seemingly problems but that doesnt constitute a bad design. Also it mentions that God cursed the earth and that we would now die, and as a result we have disease etc.... but everything still remains in its gene pool, if you will.
Hip bones in whales? these are hip bones? what evidence bonafies that? - pure propaganda no evidence junk!
Who says the holes in the abdominal is vulnerable? you again and the propagandists? Show me evidence of poor design, you claiming something is vulnerable isnt evidence! So as I said pure Junk! and I even went light in my rebutal! If you want resources I can get those too!
> Blind spot? what does that got to do with anything that
> shows evidence to a bad design,
Are you one of those people who marches through the weddings and baptisms in your life with one thumb firmly placed over the lens of your camera?
Are you arguing that it is "good" practice to do so, since taking out large chunks of an image doesn't degrade its quality?