Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Caleb1411

Lewis Thomas, by the way, may have gotten the idea from Arthur C. Clarke, who emphasized the universal appeal to the intellect of Bach's music in his novel _2001_ back in the 1960's. No idea why Kubrick picked Strauss for the movie version.


11 posted on 02/22/2007 1:00:07 PM PST by omnivore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: omnivore

The script for the film actually predated the novel. Kubrick used both Strausses and Ligeti.


14 posted on 02/22/2007 1:01:06 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: omnivore
No idea why Kubrick picked Strauss for the movie version.

Whatever the reason, Thus Spake Zarathustra (Richard) and The Blue Danube (Johann) worked brilliantly. Still, it is a bit surprising ole Stanley couldn't find a place for J.S. Bach's music somewhere in the film. ....especially since he worked so closely with A.C. Clarke in its making.

19 posted on 02/22/2007 1:07:28 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: omnivore

"No idea why Kubrick picked Strauss for the movie version."

I believe the story is Kubrick had already commissioned the famous Alex North to do the music for 2001.

But while he was editing the movie they were playing music (as was their wont) and "Thus Spake" came on, and just seemed to fit perfectly.


47 posted on 02/22/2007 3:34:13 PM PST by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson