Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

Let's not forget that the counter-argument offered by some at the time was that Syria or Iran was a bigger problem and why not them instead of Iraq? Well, with Saddam playing with the no-fly zone, the OFF payoffs, etc., it was prudent to get him out of the way first in order to deal with the other pressing problems in the area. Taking down Saddam was a necessary next step toward solving the problems in the region.


7 posted on 02/22/2007 4:30:03 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Prevent Glo-Ball Warming ... turn out the sun when not in use)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NonValueAdded

"Taking down Saddam was a necessary next step toward solving the problems in the region."

bttt



13 posted on 02/22/2007 10:17:31 AM PST by malia (President Bush: I won't change my principals to be popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: NonValueAdded

^^^Taking down Saddam was a necessary next step toward solving the problems in the region.^^^

&&&&&


And any member of Congress that does not acknowledge this fact does not deserve to collect a salary.


15 posted on 02/22/2007 7:10:26 PM PST by maica (America will be a hyperpower that's all hype and no power -- if we do not prevail in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson