Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dynoman
Then what about Afghanistan? It is a country too.

True, but Ron Paul voted for a Resolution advising the President to go after whomever was responsible for 9-11, since nobody was 100% certain exactly which state actors or non-state actors were directly responsible.

The President determined that the Taliban government of Afghanistan was one of the responsible parties, and so "went after" them as instructed by the Resolution. However, various Non-State actors were also involved; and as Ron Paul stated, it's difficult to imagine how to Declare War on a Non-Country. So, Ron Paul supported a Resolution which would authorize military force against Non-State actors as well.

405 posted on 02/20/2007 2:10:54 PM PST by OrthodoxPresbyterian (We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies ]


To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
The biggest loser in this thread is Ron Paul who should have 'laid low' until the non-binding resolution "show" that he helped Nancy Pelosi and John Murtha stage blew over.

Thanks to you, it didn't blow over but you helped it start to 'boil over' with your innuendo and rubber-stamp repeats of liberal-composed half-truths.

The old saying is that when you find yourself in a hole, stop digging. You've done enough damage to his campaign that I am now feeling sorry for him having such pitiful backers.

414 posted on 02/20/2007 2:23:35 PM PST by capt. norm (Liberalism = cowardice disguised as tolerance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

We attacked the terror regimes in both Afghanistan and Iraq but in Iraq it affected more than just Iraq, remember what happened with Libya the week Saddam was captured.

Read posts 80-85;

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1323498/posts?page=85#80

Iraq is just as much of the WOT as Afghanistan.

For those who think we should not have engaged the Iraq-Libya-Egypt-Iran-DPRK terror regime in Iraq what would you have done instead?

It seems to me Iraq was exactly the right place to crack the Iraq-Libya-Egypt-Iran-DPRK terrorism nut.


427 posted on 02/20/2007 2:43:40 PM PST by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

"Ron Paul voted for a Resolution advising the President to go after whomever was responsible for 9-11"

Why didn't Ron Paul call for a declaration of war against those responsible for 9/11 if he didn't know at that point (LOL...yeah, right...even I knew and I wasn't in Congress!) that al Qaida (which was openly living in Afghanistan) was behind it?


449 posted on 02/20/2007 6:46:59 PM PST by Revenge of Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

Read this;

http://billroggio.com/archives/2007/02/alzawraa_vs_alqaeda.php#comments

This shows exactly why we should stay and make/keep it safe so the political debate in Iraq can happen.

It won't happen if we pull out early.

IMO the good guys WILL win the debate, if we stay and help them out.

A 1400 year old mindset doesn't change in a few years.


488 posted on 02/21/2007 5:23:12 AM PST by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson