[Revenge of Sith]

However, it's inconsistent of Paul's defenders hide behind the "Congress should declare war" spin to justify his vote against the war in Iraq since he did vote to authorize military force in Afghanistan without a declaration of war.

[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

However, it's inconsistent of Paul's defenders hide behind the "Congress should declare war" spin to justify his vote against the war in Iraq since he did vote to authorize military force in Afghanistan without a declaration of war.

Actually, he didn't. The text does not specify "Afghanistan".

TEXT: That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.

Ron Paul voted for the AUMF against the 9-11 terrorists because "To declare war against a group that is not a country makes the clear declaration of war more complex.... The proposed resolution is the only option we're offered and doing nothing is unthinkable." Ron Paul, http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2001/tst091701.htm

However, while it may not be possible to declare war against "a group that is not a country", Iraq is a Country -- and the Constitution provides clear details on how the United States is to go about making War on a Country. Specifically, Congress is to issue a Declaration of War, as Ron Paul advocated.