Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gondramB
There are some questionable adjustments in the GISS series http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1142.

It is best to plot using GHCN unadjusted data, and one should include the Hadl/Reyn ocean series for completeness and compare apples with apples by plotting January only data change (i.e trend selection) through the full 1951-2007 data set not just January 1971 of the default selection.

Hit the link above in #11.. so the map data and zonal average plot can be seen together.

12 posted on 02/19/2007 9:15:25 PM PST by ancient_geezer (Don't reform it, Replace it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: ancient_geezer

Thanks for the response.

Would you help me understand your post a little better?

I looked at the climate audit page - it looks like the raw data is the same as the NASA page but there are two different fits to the data... Is that the main point? I guess you correctly figured that the chart I used was from NASA.

BTW, 1950/1951 is an imperfect choice to get a good view since 6 years earlier global warming basically stopped (one problem with human caused global warming is that global warming basically stopped between 1945 and 1976).


13 posted on 02/20/2007 5:33:40 AM PST by gondramB (It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson