Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker
The new specimen was probably male, a fruit-eater and was slightly smaller than a chimpanzee, researchers say.

Probably female. I'm just as right as they are. See those fangs in the picture, I guess they were used to tear bananas peel from peel.

71 posted on 02/19/2007 6:19:03 AM PST by 4CJ (Annoy a liberal, honour Christians and our gallant Confederate dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 4CJ
The new specimen was probably male, a fruit-eater and was slightly smaller than a chimpanzee, researchers say.

And scientists wonder why they don't have any credibility.

The evolutionists regualrly criticize the creation account because of the meat-eating-animals-whose-teeth-aren't-suited-for-a-vegatarian- diet issues, and yet here we have *scientists* looking at some sizable looking canines claming that this creature was *probably* a *fruit eater*.

Maybe they used those teeth like those juicer gadgets; poke a hole in the orange and such the juice out. Sounds good to me.

72 posted on 02/19/2007 7:31:17 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson