To: Jim Robinson
Absolutely not. I intend to see Rudy defeated in the primary!! Thanks!
I'm getting really sick of all of these Rudyites talking about Rudy v. Hillary as if it is a fait accompli and then using that as the reason we should support a pro-infanticide, pro-homosexual gun grabber. Rudy WILL NOT be the nominee and I really don't think the 'Rats are going to nominate Hildabeast.
67 posted on
02/18/2007 4:46:12 PM PST by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
Hillary will get the nomination, since she has ways of getting what she wants.
70 posted on
02/18/2007 4:47:05 PM PST by
darkangel82
(Socialism is NOT an American value.)
To: wagglebee
"I'm getting really sick of all of these Rudyites talking about Rudy v. Hillary as if it is a fait accompli and then using that as the reason we should support a pro-infanticide, pro-homosexual gun grabber."
Very nice illustration of the 'can't see the forest for the trees' point of view.
Please read my post 17 (as well as the two lengthier ones I posted afterwards.
74 posted on
02/18/2007 4:47:36 PM PST by
Al Simmons
(Why Rudy in 2008? Because National Security should not be left to children.)
To: wagglebee
and I really don't think the 'Rats are going to nominate Hildabeast. I don't either, she's not far enough left for the moonbats that vote in dem primaries.
83 posted on
02/18/2007 4:50:39 PM PST by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: wagglebee
A serious comment on a thread full of snide remarks:
Who do you think the final match-up will be?
665 posted on
02/19/2007 6:26:55 AM PST by
RockinRight
(When Chuck Norris goes to bed at night, he checks under the bed for Jack Bauer.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson